How to win at Roulette every time?
How to win at Roulette every time?
- This topic has 24 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 10 months ago by .
Advantage of Playing Online Roulette. The roulette is easy to start up by watching the videos that appear as a game. The player can start the bet at the minimum of cost and start playing the game. How to win online roulette every time and can achieve the maximum of 100% bonus by using the bonus code to play. Like most roulette systems, this strategy requires you to bet on Red/Black, Odd/Even, 1-18, or 19-36. You double your bet every time you win and continue to do so until you win three bets in a row. When you win three times in a row or lose, revert to your initial bet and repeat the process.
How To Win At Online Roulette Every Time One
Time to dip in to the collective knowledge.
A kid I work with reckoned that he had a fool proof method of winning at roulette.
I have been testing it today on a roulette app and it works but you need a lot of money behind you to ensure you win.
I have never actually been in a casino so I don't know the rules but would this be allowed as it totally takes chance out of the game.
The idea is simple and to describe it I will start with £1, put 1 on red or black, you win you get 2 back, you lose then put 2 on the colour you chose, you win you get 4 so your actually 1 up on your starting point. As long as you stand fast and double the bet every loss and keep the bet on the colour you started with you will win eventually. The longest loosing streak I had was 6 so that meant I had lost 63 and needed to bet 64 to end up 1 up.
That was rare though, most of the time a red would come up between every 1 and 3 spins.
Using the free app I was better £10 a time and I was £100 up within 5 mins. The only way to lose is to run out of stake money before your colour comes up.
So would a casino allow you to play this way?
No idea if a Casino would let you do this but don't try it on the online roulette games, I'm convinced they're rigged to weed out exactly this kind of thing and you'll lose all your money. Juegos de casino free online.
The casino will happily let you play like this. The house edge is still 2.7% if you bet on red or black so they couldn't care less how you play. Their bankroll is much bigger than yours so you will still run out of money eventually.
Roulette is a fair game and the only strategy for a (non-rigged) roulette game is to be the casino!
Don't do it – it's extremely dangerous.
You can quickly get to a situation where you're wagering vast sums of money to try to win a very small amount; ultimately you run the risk of reaching a point where you simply can't afford to place the bet, or, more likely, you'll reach the max stake for the table and be unable to win your money back. And yes, the casino may decide they don't like what you're doing and refuse to take further wagers.
Of course, probability being what it is, you'll usually get away with this – you have a high chance of winning a small amount, and a small chance of losing a huge amount.
It isn't a winning strategy in the long term, though – whatever you do in European Roulette you will tend towards losing an average of 1/37th of the total amount you wager, the house edge is built in. (1/74th for French Roulette, 1/19th for American Roulette with the 0 and 00).
It's a known as the Martingale method and is very well known.
In theory yes it would always work if you had unlimited money but in reality it's quite easy to run out of money quickly, with £10 a time you only a good streak of losses before you're getting into big numbers and most tables will have a table limit on red and black.
What you're actually doing is offsetting your odds by increasing your stake. So you'll win £10 again and again and again, then suddenly you'll lose a big sum which will wipe out all your winnings.
online roulette games, I'm convinced they're rigged to weed out exactly this kind of thing
@flyguy I don't think the major ones are – they don't have to be. If they have lots of people playing, they're raking in the house edge anyway.Lulu yang poker. won't a table limit kick in at some point and stop you placing a high bet?
The method works, as does the same if you bet on the favourite horse in every race until you won your desired amount. It does require a large working pot compared to what you want to gain though and critically discipline. If you go in with say a grand, you win your £50 in 5mins, you have to walk away. Most can't.
As @andpandy says the table limits (max and min) are set so you max out and lose a large amount of money too often for it to make economical sense.
In the end the house always wins!
The method works, as does the same if you bet on the favourite horse in every race until you won your desired amount.
@funny Nope, it would only work if you had infinite money and time and the bookie/casino would accept infinite stakes.It's simply a form of low-odds betting, where you risk a large amount for a high (but not certain) probability of winning a small amount.
It's negative value – people doing it lose money on average (though many get lucky).
It's not fool proof and you'll make very little.
Say you play for £1, forget the 0 and let's pretend the wheel goes red them black, etc so you win every other go.
After 100 spinss you've won £50, it's taken you 3 hours and you're making £16/hour minus expenses. You're not going to break their bank and is it really worthwhile.
??????So them instead of £1 let's go for £100, with a view to making £5k in an evening. But your run of 6 meant you needed almost £7k of cash on you. What happens if it's the last few spins of the night, if it goes wrong on just the last 4 that's £1500 gone.
Further to my above post, given losing 6 times means losing 63x stake and having to gamble 64x, is we assumed that you couldn't fund that, then based on that occuring ~3.9% of the time in 10 games (I excluded zero to make the maths possible in my head), you'd only have a 50:50 chance of making it past 170 spins.
Then only thing that favours the casino is you running out of money or having a hard stop. The longer you play the more it acts in their favour. The less you play the less you can make from this route.
Want a guaranteed way to beat the casinos. Find one with a good restaurant, invariably the food and drink is subsidised by the gambling to draw you in.
Go and have a nice steak washed down with some of last decades burgundy. Enjoy the satisfaction of paying less than in a pure restaurant. Leave without gambling.
As each bet is independent of each other bet, why not start with the highest bet first and work down? Then, if you loose the highest bet, you don't have to loose all the other ones to get there and you have halved your losses. Win and you don't have to loose all the other bets either and come out richer.
Doubling up. When I first started work in the 60s a mate at work suggested exactly this to me. Foolproof, he said. We went to a casino with something like £20 between us (this was as far as I remember 1967 or 68). We came out that night with £110 each, which seemed a fortune at the time. So of course went back the next night… and lost it all. Yes, you have to have a huge amount of money to make it work, the casino has to have no limit to how many times you can double up and thirdly there's always the chance that the ball lands on zero in which case the bank wins.
The other way to win in the casinos is to play games against other people and not the casino. For example in the poker room, the casino might still take 5% off the table, but if you are more than 5% better than the other players then you will take their money and end up ahead on average
The casino couldn't care less who wins (someone always does) as they still take 5% but if you are a good player playing against drunken people that lost their money on roulette, blackjack and other losing propositions then you can walk away with their money (- the casino's fee).
In this case, the skill comes in learning the game and trying not to be the pats
The way you're playing, where you stick on the same colour (or odds and evens,) means you aren't taking it independently, but that you don't get them same in a row enough to hit the upper limit. I triple each time, if I'm lucky, it goes well, but is time consuming, if I'm not, I'm bust. I use it, but only when dragged to a casino for a social occasion and set myself an upper limit.
Many years ago, me and some pals had a winning strategy for the casino. We were bumming around for a while in Phnom Penh and there was this casino on a boat on the centre of town. Mainly Chinese businessmen (no Cambodians allowed) and us (scruffy backpackers) in the casino. We would play this dice game called sic bo. Between us we would scrape together about $10, then one of us would play betting tiny amounts. How did we win? Well, free drinks for those gambling…so we would stretch out our $10 for as long as we could (some nights we did well and came out in profit) but we always left long of about 6 to 7 pints of some dodgy asian lager on our way to Martinis.
One funny story from those nights…one of the guys I was hanging around with was an aussie who could speak fluent mandarin. He was at the sic bo table and we were huddled behind him drinking and giving useless advice. One of us knocked over a beer and it spilt all over the felt cloth of the game table. Whilst the croupier cleaned it up, a Chinese man turned to his group of friends and said something and they all laughed. My friend heard what he said ('f*cking foreigners') and turned to him and said in perfect chinese 'Your a f*cking foreigner in this country too mate' The reaction was hilarious, the Chinese group reacted in utter shame, red faces and they all got up and left immediately in silence. We felt like rock stars for a few minutes…good times.
You can't create value from nowhere, you can just play with the risk profile.
The nice thing about casino gambling is it is easy to do the analysis. When businesses are playing what is basically the same system in more complex circumstances such as a company which continually grows by acquisition or a bank operating a continually expanding position in financial markets it isn't as obvious. There can be years of apparent success before there's a catastrophic failure and a lot of people can get rich from pay and bonuses while it is happening.
It isn't a winning strategy in the long term, though – whatever you do in European Roulette you will tend towards losing an average of 1/37th of the total amount you wager, the house edge is built in. (1/74th for French Roulette, 1/19th for American Roulette with the 0 and 00).
@mark1 I've always felt that physical roulette (rather than online) is winnable, but I don't think I could do the level of analysis required to win. You only need a small advantage (and a large pot) to overcome the house edge.A lot of wheels are biased, so certain numbers or sectors are more probable than 1/37th. Also, a lot of croupiers are not random, so based on the point of release, certain sectors will be more probable. But for biased wheels, you need to analyse thousands of throws. And for autopilot croupiers, you would need to analyse and react very quickly and apparently innocently.
@carly Yeah, it may be possible to get an edge on a particular wheel or with a particular croupier – but, in addition to the enormous amount of work required to do this, you have to remember that the casino will be looking out for this and will work against you. They can (and do) rotate croupiers to make this harder, and can simply refuse to take your bets if they want.
You'd have to be enormously skilled at subterfuge to beat a casino at their own game!
Have some fun with this one. I put a max bet at £1024, 100 spins. Played it 17 times in a row, for 16 I had a net gain each time, on the 17th I wiped out all of that and ended up -£1285.
Even with hindsight, stopping at 16 x 100 would only have given me £719. To take £1000 into a casino, leave with £44 profit after a few hours.
It's not a guaranteed winning strategy as you don't have infinite time and money. If one of those is finite you can't guarantee to win. You have a certain odds of being up after so many days, which declines with time. But as ‘potential' profit increases with time, it's the human factor that ultimately makes it unwinnable.
Most normal people seem quite good at walking away from high risk-low chance-high payout of winning but find it harder to avoid high risk-high chance-low payout.
As an example of the former, you have the people selling those expensive lottery tickets at airport, disguised as win a car. Do many people as a % really play?
But on the other hand speeding in a car, very common. Payout: fractionally quicker journey, risk : high points/fine/accident/death, chance: most times you speed you don't suffer the risks.
I read a thing about how professional gamblers in '30s America used to find crooked games, wait for someone to place a big stake on a specific number and then place a relatively small bet on one of the numbers opposite. Because the tables were often rigged so the croupiers could keep the ball away from the numbers where the big money was, this skewed the odds in their favour enough for them to turn a profit.
Edit: I mean, since the tables were mostly run by the mob this may not have lead to a long and happy life anyway, but I'm still impressed by the ingenuity.
- This reply was modified 2 years, 10 months ago by .
